How Do Hack Into A Prepaid Sidekick

The earthquake and nuclear

The earthquake and nuclear
"

When we were still on the first news of the terrible earthquake that hit the northeastern coast of Japan, here is that the sites and the Italian agencies have begun to spread the word on the alert nuclear weapons. However, if the state acts first thing you can say, is that it is the terrible intensity of the phenomenon Japan, which hit us with a new confirmation that the safety of nuclear facilities, the progress made in recent decades have been impressive, such as to hold in reality without endangering the environment and the impact of its population terribly out of scale events, such as that which occurred exactly as prescribed by the rules and in accordance with which we build nuclear power plants today. Still, speculation is playing in Italy now.

Japan has 54 nuclear power plants according to the International Atomic Energy Agency, covering the central quarter of the electricity needs of the country. As you can regularly check the report of the site of the Agency, Japan is one of the countries more and more involved in the case of full transparency in its facilities. Due to the high seismic risk of a substantial part of its territory, close to or crossed by fault lines of oceanic and continental tectonic plates, has made its facilities by adopting anti-earthquake standards higher and higher over the decades.

And this is why the Wizards shut the reactors were suddenly turned on in four power plants in the Northeast affected by the earthquake epicenter to the ocean, two other more distant in any case within seven minutes the block was placed , and five other even more distant in any case within 20 minutes the Japanese authorities have ordered the detention of security, for a full audit of the estate of any part of the plant. In the middle of Onagawa, among the four in which the detention was automatic, it was immediately extinguished a fire caused by electrical shorts in a turbine is not internal to the cooling circuit of fissile material, and therefore no release of hazardous waste. For another station, that of Fukushima, the closest to Sendai on which the tsunami struck, it was still prepared to evacuate the population within two miles radius, as required by the procedures in cases where it is advisable to first think of the full safety of residents and then double check all of the absolute sealing of the facilities. Until last night, the Japanese have continued to confirm to the IAEA that no release of radioactivity was reported hazardous material

The international media have, in other words, without much understanding of amplified re-launched the first news from Tokyo, on the state of nuclear emergency proclaimed by the Tokyo government had passed an hour before the event. It 's a standard security procedure for earthquakes above 5 on the Richter scale intensity, and here we are in the presence of 8.9 intensity, energy literally frightening as documented we have all seen the pictures.

We are talking about the seventh earthquakes that ever hit the world since we have instruments to detect them and series, yet the power they held. Have proven very useful lessons learned to the greater nuclear power plant operating at the world, the Kashiwazaki-Karima which has a higher power to 8000 MW, 16 July 2007 was hit by an earthquake of magnitude 6.6. The system held, but in that case were the violent swinging to determine the spillage of 1.2 cubic meters of water from a swimming pool for spent fuel of a reactor. The release of radioactivity to the event, and for the release of some radionuclides from the plant ventilation was immediately detected and monitored over time the Japanese authorities, and is documented in the IAEA web site as corresponding to 10 millionths of the dose permitted in Japan. As a result, the incident with no environmental damage and health was classified at level zero on the INES scale, which measures the severity of nuclear contingencies.

We can draw three preliminary conclusions. One of the reasons why nuclear power plants cost a lot, it's safety, but how you see money well spent. Second, the current safety standards in Europe are as strict as those in Japan. Third, Italy has extensive seismic zones, but the phenomena are not of the magnitude of the Japanese. Attending yesterday, on many Italian anti-nuclear sites, such as a map of Italy on the overlap areas of seismic risk and those at risk even groped for fires to demonstrate that nuclear power can not afford it, it's just a demonstration of gross ignorance of technology. "