Tall Fuchia Centerpieces

What Santoro did not tell Tremonti

What Santoro did not tell

Tremonti:"
Last Thursday, in the pit of

Annozero , Giulio Tremonti

was savaged lions that roaring around. Moreover, "fair" not very dangerous:

Eugenio Scalfari , already has her unfit to television and boiled enough, Ferruccio De Bortoli repeating platitudes (the hypothetical general liberalization as salvific, the mythical small and ghostly "pocket multinationals" of a country that now finds it hard to export rags & pans) and Fausto Bertinotti gag well known in the back room of the antagonist from the pharmacist.

If you want to newspeak backward now, it seems the food for the journey in one of the shrines of the residue left to hard and pure '

coronation as the accountant of Sondrio better equipped and better positioned to suction after Berlusconi. In short, the "making of the hat" over a candidate who - under the circumstances - remains in the lap of Jupiter. Or the first sign of exasperation with a scenario in which the so-called political opposition fails to bring out whatever alternative all'inaffondabile cairn Arcore. However, the intriguing hypothesis - probably - without foundation. Rather, what is with insufficient evidence of the transmission and the difficulty of Michele Santoro to move on different terrain exposure of social pain and journalistic investigation into judicial matters. Bravo in the complaint and master the daily news about the wickedness of the Italian decadence (in which the eye acts as an avenging angel television), the renowned conductor turns out to be a fish out of water if faced

analysis that go beyond the door of home littered with garbage
moral stories that are faced with a bit 'larger of Strapaese. In fact, the other Tremonti evening a professorial with attached flip purely decorative (which draw three rows of three) could make a great impression.

Let us be clear: the description of faults produced by tremontiana

financial globalization is widely shared. At most you could just move some marginal type backdate the start to the 1973 (Yom Kippur War and the coup in Chile: the beginning of virtualization of the economy with rising raw material and rehearsal order neocon) compared to the ineffable 1989 (fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of the balances held at bay capitalism). But they are trifles. He was not sure this take the point on which the wily minister in chestnut, the Tsar of our economy in its death throes. Why does not his argument holds water on the premises, but on the consequences.

Tremonti says Gramsci, the court of history will eventually judge the perpetrators of "this" globalization, which is subject exclusively to the interests of irresponsible and suicidal tendencies of a plutocracy that has turned possessive selfishness in the only yardstick which lead the world. An increasingly Americanized, stupid consumerism bulimic and crushed by the growing inequalities. But over here who is the chief proponent of this model of society if not the head of government of which he is a minister Tremonti? And if the opinion of the minister is so radically dismissive towards policies that commodifying everything and everyone, that makes us him the People of Liberty / Impunity?

Again Tremonti adds that the planetary sgoverno stems from loss of control / regulation by nation states. Some may object that the control / regulation of financial flows triggered by globalization and human rights would be better in an institutional space where the enlarged European Union. So the Euroscepticism touted by his political party, with bass drums media in tow, have only the effect of weakening the resistance of the Old Continent to the destabilizing waves that threaten the social and political estate. Indeed, Tremonti has rightly denounced transmission in the phenomenon of xenophobia that is rampant in North Europe. Without drawing the natural consequence as there was those who tried to recall the duty of consistency.

But we are losing the capacity for governance of nation states, worried that both the superministro. Then you would have to ask him to give an account of his relationship with the League pursuing further deconstruct the design of the Italian State. Alloy which Tremonti is the maximum support, since it is finance national and local draining every resource in order to implement a federal scrap yard, which will allow Boyars bossiani to consolidate their electoral fiefdoms in the North, in a sort of pre-Alpine

neofeudalesimo
who knows so much about "community bounded and reinforced," prisoners just that blindness that prevents the reconstruction of a world-system the least plausible.

In conclusion, the other night we had yet another confirmation that Berlusconi and Berlusconi are two different things: the head is nothing but animal spirits incarnate, but behind him there are

perfidious minds at work. And that should be something to beat more and more of the usual whispers and screams. "